Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice
and
Coalition for a Safe and Healthy Connecticut

645
Farmington Ave., 3rd Floor
860-232-6232

We have seen it in the headlines recently: awareness of toxic chemical in children’s toys is on the rise. While the focus has primarily been on lead, known to be unsafe at any level of exposure, other chemicals found in children’s toys are also suspected health hazards. Chemicals of concern such as phthalates and Bisphenol A (BPA) can be found in baby bottles, baby bibs, lunch boxes, children’s jewelry, bath books and some bath and shampoo products.
Scientific studies have linked toxic chemicals such as lead, phthalates and Bisphenol A to a variety of chronic diseases in children including some cancers, asthma and learning and developmental disorders. These toxic chemicals are often found in consumer products including children’s toys, baby bottles, car seats, and other children’s products. Consumers, especially children, should not be exposed to hazardous chemicals through household products.
As children’s minds and bodies go through the delicate process of growing and developing, they are particularly vulnerable to chemicals that could affect proper development.
Phthalates, a known human health hazard, are used in a variety of children’s products throughout the United States. Phthalates are commonly added to vinyl to make it soft and flexible. Children have a natural tendency to suck on objects as a way of exploring the world around them and therefore are very easily exposed to the phthalates that can leach out of these products.
· An independent, EPA-certified laboratory analyzed 33 soft vinyl toys purchased in the U.S. for their content of diisononylphthalate (DINP) and other phthalates. DINP levels were found to range from 11.4 to 57.2% of the toy by weight. This was found in both bath and squeeze toys sold by major retailers as well as teethers and other toys manufactured by non-U.S. companies and sold in discount/”dollar” stores in select metropolitan areas.[i]
Childhood lead poisoning is the most common environmental health problem affecting Connecticut’s children, and has been identified as a particularly serious issue in communities of color and low income. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, even minimally elevated blood lead levels can negatively affect a child’s learning ability and behavior.
LEAD IN BABY BIBS AND LUNCH BOXES
· A sample of vinyl baby bibs had a lead level of 9700 parts per million, more than 16 times greater than the federal legal limit for lead in paint.[ii]
· Tests on children’s soft vinyl lunch boxes showed levels of lead up to 90 times above the legal limit for lead paint in children’s products. The lead is not a paint component; it is found in the vinyl itself, and in most cases the highest lead levels were found in the lining of soft plastic lunch boxes, where lead could come into direct contact with food.[iii]
· A study conducted in 2007 tested 339 pieces of children’s jewelry and found that 60% tested positive for lead.[iv]
· A study published in the bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology found that the majority of bracelets, rings, necklaces and earrings bought from big chain stores leached enough lead to cause minor neurological damage with just 20 second of daily contact.
Bisphenol A, found in plastic products like shatter proof baby bottles and the linings of some cans, has been linked to increased risk of breast cancer, developmental toxicity and potential neurotoxicity.
· Environment California found that all of the five top selling brands of baby bottles leached bisphenol A at levels found to cause harm in numerous laboratory studies.[v]
· According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, 95% of Americans have detectable levels of bisphenol A in their bodies.
Current laws allow toxic chemicals in everyday products, including those marketed for children. Manufacturers have no incentive to use safer alternatives, leaving our children guinea pigs.
That’s the bad news. The good news is that solutions are available and with the mounting scientific evidence it is time for change.
Safer alternatives to these chemicals exist and can be used to ensure children’s health and safety. In the absence of adequate federal regulations, new state policies are necessary to reduce childhood exposure to unsafe chemicals.
Getting toxics out of toys is a
good place to start!
European countries have already taken the step of banning phthalates as a primary prevention measure. Japan and several other countries have adapted similar restrictions on the use of phthalates, and other states are looking at banning certain chemicals of concern in children’s toys.
U.S. Unions are taking action into their own hands. The United Steelworkers have launched a nationwide campaign, supported by a broad array of consumer and environmental groups, reaching out to consumers in their neighborhoods to educate families about how to screen for lead contaminants in toys and other products. “We’ve allowed toxic toys and other products to come in through the back door, free of regulation but bearing an enormous cost to working families,” says United Steelworkers President, Leo W. Gerard said.
In 2007, the Coalition will be pressing for legislation to phase out chemicals of concern in children’s toys and articles, and provide seed funding for an Institute to test toys and study safer alternatives.
Visit www.safehealthyct.org or contact Sarah Uhl, Coalition Coordinator, 860-232-6232
Administrative and Residual Employees Union # 4200 (A & R 4200) * Clean Water Action * ConnectiCOSH * ConnFESS * CT Association of Directors of Health (CADH) * CT Association of Public Health Nurses (CAPHN) * CT Chapter, American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO-CT) * CT Citizen Action Group * CT Coalition for Environmental Justice (CCEJ) * CT Northeast Organic Food Association (NOFA) * CT Nurses Association (CNA) * CT Public Health Association (CPHA) * CT State Council of Machinists * Council 4 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) * Ecological Health Organization (ECHO) * Environment Connecticut * Hartford Central Labor Council * Sierra Club Connecticut Chapter * Teamsters 559 * Toxics Action Center * The Watershed Partnership
[i] “Toxic Content Analysis” (1999) Compoled by National Environmental Trust, data collected by STAT Analysis Corporation.
[ii] Cox, Caroline (2007). “An Unnecessary Poison: Babies, Bibs and Lead.” Center for Environmental Health.
[iii] “Lead in Childrne’s Vinyl Lunchboxes.” (2007). Center for Environmental Health.
[iv] Fosmire, D;Curtis, D (2007). “Lead in Low-Cost Jewelry: Do You Know What Your Child is Wearing?” Wildlife Protection Unit.
[v] Gibson, Rachel (2007). “Toxic Baby Bottles.” Environment California.